Wilson v. Warden, Franklin Medical Center

District Court, S.D. Ohio·Decided October 15, 2019·No. 3:19-cv-00266·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

LAWRENCE EARL WILSON,

Petitioner, : Case No. 3:19-cv-266

- vs - District Judge Thomas M. Rose Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

RHONDA RICHARDS, Warden, Franklin Medical Center,

: Respondent. ORDER VACATING STAY AND REQUIRING AMENDED PETITION

This is an action for a writ of habeas corpus, brought pro se by Petitioner Lawrence Wilson under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Upon its filing, the Court noted the pendency of Wilson’s Application to the Sixth Circuit under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b) for permission to file a second or successive habeas corpus application (ECF No. 2). That court has now filed an Order denying Wilson’s Application. In re: Lawrence E. Wilson, Case No. 19-3310 (6th Cir. Oct. 11, 2019)(unreported; copy filed at ECF No. 3). However, the circuit court also found permission was unnecessary as to Wilson’s proposed third and fourth grounds for relief because they “concern the denial of parole in 2017 and therefore ‘assert[] claims whose predicates arose after the filing of the original petition.’” Id. at PageID 3, citing In re Jones, 652 F.3d 603, 605-06 (6th Cir. 2010).” Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that this Court’s Stay be, and it hereby is, VACATED. Petitioner shall file, not later than November 1, 2019, an amended petition setting forth the two grounds (numbered as grounds one and two) on which the Sixth Circuit found he may proceed.

October 15, 2019. s/ Michael R. Merz United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. Warden, Franklin Medical Center, (S.D. Ohio 2019).

Wilson v. Warden, Franklin Medical Center (Wilson v. Warden, Franklin Medical Center) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Jones
652 F.3d 603 (Sixth Circuit, 2010)