Wilson v. State

34 S.W.3d 206, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1790, 2000 WL 1741541
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wilson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 840
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 28, 2000·No. No. ED 77435·Published

Opinion

[207]*207ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant Sean Wilson appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after a hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.085(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. State, 34 S.W.3d 206, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1790, 2000 WL 1741541 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000).

34 S.W.3d 206 (Wilson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.