Wilson v. State

119 S.W.3d 560, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1656, 2003 WL 22399737
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wilson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1707
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 21, 2003·No. No. ED 82052·Published

Opinion

[561]*561ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Curtis Wilson (“Movant”), appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant was convicted of criminal nonsupport, section 568.040 RSMo 2000,1 and tampering in the first degree, section 569.080. Movant was sentenced to five years imprisonment on each charge, and the sentences were to run concurrently. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. State, 119 S.W.3d 560, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1656, 2003 WL 22399737 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003).

119 S.W.3d 560 (Wilson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.