Home/Missouri Court of Appeals/Wilson v. State

Wilson v. State

882 S.W.2d 764, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1383, 1994 WL 463895
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wilson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1694 →
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 30, 1994·No. No. 65409·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals after the dismissal of his Rule 24.035 motion as untimely. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)(2) and (5).

Further, we find an opinion in this case would have no precedential value and affirm by summary order. Rule 84.16(b). We have provided a memorandum to the parties for their use only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. State, 882 S.W.2d 764, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1383, 1994 WL 463895 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

882 S.W.2d 764 (Wilson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.