Wilson v. State

855 S.W.2d 525, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 976, 1993 WL 226284
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 29, 1993
DocketNo. WD 47180
StatusPublished

This text of 855 S.W.2d 525 (Wilson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilson v. State, 855 S.W.2d 525, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 976, 1993 WL 226284 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Vance G. Wilson, movant in a postconviction proceeding, appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing.

We dismiss the appeal for failure to comply with Rule 24.035(b) by timely filing the pro se motion in the trial court. Partridge v. State, 848 S.W.2d 550, 551 (Mo.App.1993). An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Partridge v. State
848 S.W.2d 550 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
855 S.W.2d 525, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 976, 1993 WL 226284, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-state-moctapp-1993.