Wilson v. State

168 So. 3d 345, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 10675, 2015 WL 4231632
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wilson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 1650
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 14, 2015·No. No. 1D13-6131·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Joe Eddie Wilson appeals his conviction for driving while his license was canceled, suspended, or revoked with two or more previous convictions for the same offense in violation of section 322.34(2)(c), Florida Statutes (2012). He was sentenced to four [346]*346years in prison after a jury trial where he had proceeded pro se.

He argues on appeal, with the assistance of public counsel, that the trial court did not conduct an adequate inquiry into whether his waiver of the right to counsel was knowing and intelligent. Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.111(d); Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975). We agree. As the State properly concedes, Appellant is entitled to a new trial. See e.g., Brown v. State, 971 So.2d 270 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008). Accordingly, we REVERSE Appellant’s conviction and sentence and REMAND for a new trial.

ROWE, RAY, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. State, 168 So. 3d 345, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 10675, 2015 WL 4231632 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

168 So. 3d 345 (Wilson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Faretta v. California
422 U.S. 806 (Supreme Court, 1975)
Brown v. State
971 So. 2d 270 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)