Wilson v. State
100 So. 3d 225, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 18976, 2012 WL 5349500
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wilson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 28 So. 3d 93 →
Opinion
Affirmed without prejudice to any right appellant may have to file an appropriate postconviction motion. See, e.g., State v. Lyons, 979 So.2d 1074 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008); Llerena v. State, 953 So.2d 31, 33 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (remanding to trial court for examination of the plea transcript, clerk’s notes in the court file, and [226]*226the judgment and sentence to determine whether the sentence was ordered to be coterminous with the other sentences imposed).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wilson v. State, 100 So. 3d 225, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 18976, 2012 WL 5349500 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).
100 So. 3d 225 (Wilson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Llerena v. State
953 So. 2d 31 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
State v. Lyons
979 So. 2d 1074 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)