Wilson v. State

164 So. 3d 806, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 8752, 2015 WL 3561477
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wilson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 1650
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 9, 2015·No. No. 1D14-586·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm, without discussion, Appellant’s convictions and sentences for possession of a controlled substance; resisting a law enforcement officer without violence; and driving while license is cancelled, suspended or revoked — second conviction. However, we conclude, and the State properly concedes, the trial court erred by imposing a Public Defender lien of $150 without providing Appellant an opportunity to contest it. See § 938.29(5), Fla. Stat.; Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.720(d)(1) (“Notice of the accused’s right to a hearing to contest the amount of the lien shall be given at the time of sentence.”); see also Vaughn v. State, 65 So.3d 138, 139 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (“[T]he State properly concedes that the Public Defender lien fee should be stricken because the trial court did not advise [the defendant] of his right to a hearing to contest the amount of the fees.”). We therefore remand for the trial court to either strike the $150 Public Defender lien or give Appellant the opportunity to contest the amount of the lien. See Chestnut v. State, 145 So.3d 193, 194 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014).

AFFIRMED; REMANDED with directions.

THOMAS, MARSTILLER, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. State, 164 So. 3d 806, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 8752, 2015 WL 3561477 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

164 So. 3d 806 (Wilson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vaughn v. State
65 So. 3d 138 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Chestnut v. State
145 So. 3d 193 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)