Wilson v. State

918 So. 2d 378, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 20254, 2005 WL 3535114
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wilson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 846 So. 2d 1220
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 28, 2005·No. No. 2D05-3634·Published

Opinion

ALTENBERND, Judge.

Jay Walter Wilson appeals an order denying his motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm the order denying relief on all grounds except one. Mr. Wilson argues that he did not qualify as a sexual predator. The trial court denied this ground, relying on our earlier cases, which held that this designation could not be reviewed in this fashion. In King v. State, 911 So.2d 229 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005), this court recently held that the sexual predator designation could be challenged in a motion filed under rule 3.800(a). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Affirmed In part, reversed in part, and remanded.

CANADY and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. State, 918 So. 2d 378, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 20254, 2005 WL 3535114 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

918 So. 2d 378 (Wilson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

King v. State
911 So. 2d 229 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)