Wilson v. State

881 So. 2d 563, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6438, 2004 WL 1584926
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 7, 2004·No. No. 5D04-684·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find no merit in appellant’s latest appeal and affirm. Moreover, we hold that his successive petitions constitute an abuse of the judicial system. See, e.g., Carlisle v. State, 849 So.2d 1146 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003); Isley v. State, 652 So.2d 409 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). Accordingly, we order Wilson to show cause within 30 days from the date of this opinion why he should not be precluded from filing any further pro se pleadings raising these issues in this criminal case. See, e.g., State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999); Steele v. State, 859 So.2d 524 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).

AFFIRMED.

SAWAYA, C.J., PLEUS and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. State, 881 So. 2d 563, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6438, 2004 WL 1584926 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

881 So. 2d 563 (Wilson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. State
881 So. 2d 563 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)