Wilson v. State
812 So. 2d 591, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 4276, 2002 WL 492580
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wilson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 734 So. 2d 1107 →
Opinion
The Defendant appeals an order denying the Defendant’s rule 3.800(a) motion. The trial court did not attach to its order portions of the record which refute the Defendant’s claim. See Ford v. State, 667 So.2d 455 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). The State concedes that such attachments should have been made. We reverse and remand for the trial court to attach the portions of the record refuting the claim pursuant to our ruling in Ford.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wilson v. State, 812 So. 2d 591, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 4276, 2002 WL 492580 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
812 So. 2d 591 (Wilson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ford v. State
667 So. 2d 455 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)