Wilson v. State

748 So. 2d 343, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 16551, 1999 WL 1115426
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 8, 1999·No. No. 99-0684·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Without first seeking relief in the trial court, appellant challenges his judgment of conviction based on an alleged lack of factual basis for the plea and his 5-year prison sentence on the ground that the Prison Releasee Reoffender Act is unconstitutional. A defendant who has entered a plea may directly challenge the factual basis for his plea only after preserving the issue by a motion to withdraw the plea, see Davis v. State, 652 So.2d 503 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), or challenge an alleged sentencing error only after preserving the issue in the lower tribunal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(B). Because appellant has not preserved the issues raised, we dismiss this appeal without prejudice for appellant to move to withdraw his plea or to seek post-conviction relief in the trial court.

DISMISSED.

GUNTHER, KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. State, 748 So. 2d 343, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 16551, 1999 WL 1115426 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

748 So. 2d 343 (Wilson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Erts v. State
791 So. 2d 529 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)