Wilson v. State

808 So. 2d 1285, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2958, 2002 WL 377028
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 12, 2002·No. No. 1D01-377·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The evidence presented in this case was legally insufficient to establish that the pursuing officer had “agency insignia and other jurisdictional markings prominently displayed on the vehicle” as required by section 316.1935(3), Florida Statutes (1999). We therefore reverse the appel[1286]*1286lant’s conviction of second degree felony fleeing or attempting to elude a law enforcement officer. See Jackson v. State, 27 Fla. L. Weekly D213, — So.2d -, 2002 WL 63362 (Fla. 2d DCA Jan. 18, 2002). However, because the evidence was sufficient to establish the category one lesser included offense of misdemeanor fleeing or attempting to elude a law enforcement officer in violation of section 316.1935(1) and because the jury was properly instructed on it, we remand, pursuant to section 924.34, Florida Statutes, for the trial court to enter a judgment of conviction for that offense.

WEBSTER and BENTON, JJ., and SMITH, LARRY G., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. State, 808 So. 2d 1285, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2958, 2002 WL 377028 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

808 So. 2d 1285 (Wilson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kinney v. State
808 So. 2d 1285 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)