Wilson v. State

640 So. 2d 1238, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7983, 1994 WL 416132
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 11, 1994·No. No. 93-1577·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, after pleading nolo conten-dere to the charge of burglary of a dwelling, challenges a subsequent trial court order directing him to pay $7,500 in restitution.1 We reverse in part and remand for further proceedings.

The amount of restitution appellant was ordered to pay for a native American ceremonial pipe which was taken is not supported by the evidence. We therefore reverse and remand for another hearing to determine the amount of restitution to be ordered for this item. In all other respects, the order on appeal is affirmed.

Reversed in part and remanded.

BARFIELD, MINER and MICKLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. State, 640 So. 2d 1238, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7983, 1994 WL 416132 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

640 So. 2d 1238 (Wilson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In the Interest of H.S. v. State
640 So. 2d 1238 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Teasley v. State
640 So. 2d 1239 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)