Wilson v. State
606 So. 2d 512, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11273, 1992 WL 310322
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wilson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 566 So. 2d 36 →
Opinion
After review of the initial brief, the record and pertinent authorities, we conclude that the trial court correctly denied appellant’s rule 3.800(a) motion to correct sentence, albeit, apparently, for the wrong reasons. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979).
Since appellant has failed to demonstrate a preliminary basis for reversal, we summarily affirm the order on review pursuant to rule 9.315(a), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wilson v. State, 606 So. 2d 512, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11273, 1992 WL 310322 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).
606 So. 2d 512 (Wilson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee
377 So. 2d 1150 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)