Wilson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided April 5, 2018·No. 16-691·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 16-0691V Filed: June 26, 2017 UNPUBLISHED

ALBERT WILSON, Special Processing Unit (SPU); Joint Petitioner, Stipulation on Damages; Tetanus v. Diphtheria acellular Pertussis (Tdap) Vaccine; Brachial Neuritis; SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Parsonage Turner Syndrome. HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

Diana Lynn Stadelnikas, Maglio Christopher & Toale, PA, Sarasota, FL, for petitioner. Althea Walker Davis, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master:

On June 13, 2016, Albert Wilson (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered an injury to his left shoulder, including brachial neuritis (“Parsonage Turner Syndrome”), as a result of a Tetanus Diphtheria acellular Pertussis (“Tdap”) vaccine he received on May 21, 2015. Petition at 1-2; Stipulation, filed June 26, 2017, at ¶ 4. Petitioner further alleges that his injuries have lasted for more than six months. Petition at 2; Stipulation at ¶ 4. “Respondent denies that the Tdap vaccine caused petitioner to suffer brachial neuritis or any other injury or his current condition.” Stipulation at ¶ 6.

Nevertheless, on June 26, 2017, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation, stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. The undersigned

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). finds the stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, the undersigned awards the following compensation:

A lump sum of $71,350.00, in the form of a check payable to petitioner. Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Id.

The undersigned approves the requested amount for petitioner’s compensation. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.

2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

ALBERT WILSON, ) ) Petitione1-, ) No. 16-691V ) Chief Special Maste1; v. ) Nora Beth Dorsey ) ECF SECRETARY OF HEALTH ) AND HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent: ) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~)

STIPULATION

The pa11ies hereby stipulate to the following matters:

1. Albert Wilson, petitioner, filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the NationaJ ·

Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa- t0 to 34 (the "Vaccine Program0 ).

The petition seeks compensation fo1· injuries allegedly related to petitioner's receipt of the

tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis C'Tdap") vaccine, which vaccine is contained in the

Vaccine Injury Table (the "Table''), 42 C.F.R. § I 00.3(a).

2. Petitioner received a Tdap vaccine on or about May 21, 2015.

3. The vaccine was administered within the United States.

4. Petitioner alleges that he suffered Parsonage-Turner Syndrome as the result of his

Tdap vaccination and that he suffered the residual effects of this injury for more than six months.

5. Petitioner rep1·esents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action

for damages on his behalf as a result of his alleged vaccine injury.

6. Respondent denies that the Tdap vaccine caused petitioner to suffet· brachia! neuritis

or any other inju1·y 01' his current condition. 7. Maintaining their above ..stated positions, the pat1ies nevertheless now agree that the

issues between them shall be settled and that a decisi~n should be entered awarding the

compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practfoable aftei· an ei1try of judgment reflecting a decision consistent with

the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to teceive compensation

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa·2 l (a)(J ), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue

the following vaccine compensation payment:

A lump sum of $71,350.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This amount represents compensation for aJI damages that wou1d be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

9. As soon as practicable after the entry of judgment on entitlement in this case, and after.

petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 300aa-2 l (a)(l ), and an application, the parties will submit to flll'ther proceedings before

the special master to award reasonabJe attorneys' fees and costs incur1·ed in proceeding upon this

petition.

10. Petitioner and his attorney represent that they have identified to respondent alJ known

soul'ces of payment for items or services foi· which the Progr·am is not primarily liable under 42

U.S.C. § 300aa-l 5(g)~ including State compensation programs, insurance policies. Federal or

State health benefits programs (other than Title XIX of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.

§ 1396 et seq.)), or entities that provide health services on a pre-paid basis.

11. Payment made pursuant to paragraph 8 and any amounts awarded pursuant to

paragraph 9 oft~is Stipulation will be made in accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 300aaMl5(i), subject

to the availability of sufficient statutory funds.

2 12. The parties and their attorneys further agree and stipulate that, except for any award

for attorney's fees and litigation costs, the money provided pursuant to this Stipulation will be

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2018).

Wilson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Wilson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)
§ 300aa-2
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2
§ 300aa-l
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l
§ 300aaMl5
42 U.S.C. § 300aaMl5(i)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a