Wilson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided July 15, 2016·No. 14-411·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

******************** * DANNY WILSON, * * No. 14-411V Petitioner, * Special Master Christian J. Moran * v. * Filed: June 24, 2016 * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Stipulation; influenza (“flu”) vaccine; AND HUMAN SERVICES, * shoulder injury related to vaccine * administration (“SIRVA”). Respondent. * ******************** * Richard Gage, Richard Gage, P.C., Cheyenne, WY, for Petitioner; Traci R. Patton, U.S. Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

UNPUBLISHED DECISION1

On June 24, 2016, the parties filed a joint stipulation concerning the petition for compensation filed by Danny Wilson on May 13, 2014. In his petition, petitioner alleged that the influenza (“flu”) vaccine, which is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C.F.R. §100.3(a), and which he received on or about October 22, 2012, caused him to suffer a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”). Petitioner further alleges that he suffered the residual effects of this injury for more than six months. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages on his behalf as a result of his condition.

Respondent states there is not a preponderance of evidence demonstrating that petitioner’s condition is due to a factor unrelated to vaccination.

1 The E-Government Act, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services), requires that the Court post this decision on its website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b), the parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing redaction of medical information or other information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4). Any redactions ordered by the special master will appear in the document posted on the website. Accordingly, petitioner is entitled to compensation, under the terms of the Vaccine Act, for his SIRVA as described in the stipulation attached hereto as Appendix A. The undersigned finds said stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Damages awarded in that stipulation include:

A lump sum payment of $175,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Danny Wilson. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC, Appendix B, the clerk is directed to enter judgment in case 14-411V according to this decision and the attached stipulation.2

Any questions may be directed to my law clerk, Shannon Proctor, at (202) 357-6360.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Christian J. Moran Christian J. Moran Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties can expedite entry of judgment by each party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review by a United States Court of Federal Claims judge.

2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

DANNY WILSON,

Petitioner, No. 14-411V v. Special Master Moran ECF SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

1. Petitioner filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the National Vaccine Injury

Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 to 34 (the “Vaccine Program”). The petition

seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to petitioner’s receipt of the influenza (“flu”)

vaccine, which vaccine is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C.F.R.

§ 100.3(a).

2. Petitioner received the flu vaccination on or about October 22, 2012.

3. The vaccine was administered within the United States.

4. Petitioner suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA).

5. Petitioner experienced the residual effects of his injury for more than six months.

6. There is not a preponderance of evidence demonstrating that petitioner’s condition is

due to a factor unrelated to vaccination.

7. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action

for damages as a result of his condition. 8. Accordingly, petitioner is entitled to compensation under the terms of the Vaccine Act

for his SIRVA. Therefore, a decision should be entered awarding the compensation described in

Paragraph 9 of this stipulation.

9. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent with

the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive compensation

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue a

lump sum of $175,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This amount represents

compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. §300aa-15(a).

10. As soon as practicable after the entry of judgment on entitlement in this case, and

after petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), and an application, the parties will submit to further proceedings

before the special master to award reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in proceeding

upon this petition.

11. Petitioner and his attorney represent that compensation to be provided pursuant to

this Stipulation is not for any items or services for which the Program is not primarily liable

under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(g), to the extent that payment has been made or can reasonably be

expected to be made under any State compensation programs, insurance policies, Federal or

State health benefits programs (other than Title XIX of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.

§ 1396 et seq.)), or by entities that provide health services on a pre-paid basis.

12. Payment made pursuant to paragraph 9 and any amounts awarded pursuant to

paragraph 10 of this Stipulation will be made in accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(i),

subject to the availability of sufficient statutory funds.

2 13. The parties and their attorneys further agree and stipulate that, except for any award

for attorneys’ fees and litigation costs and past unreimbursable expenses, the money provided

pursuant to this Stipulation will be used solely for the benefit of petitioner as contemplated by a

strict construction of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a) and (d), and subject to the conditions of 42 U.S.C.

§ 300aa-15(g) and (h).

14. In return for the payments described in paragraphs 9 and 10, petitioner, in his

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2016).

Wilson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Wilson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-12
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4)
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)
§ 300aa-21
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a