Wilson v. Farmers Insurance Group

2003 ND 8
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wilson v. Farmers Insurance Group. Read the opinion of the Court — 655 N.W.2d 414
North Dakota Supreme Court·Decided January 17, 2003·No. 20020209·Published

Opinion

Filed 1/17/03 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2003 ND 2

Kim Perteet Downing, Claimant and Appellant

v.

North Dakota Workers

Compensation Bureau,                                                                                    Appellee

        and

Pro-Serve Corporation, Respondent

No. 20020257

Appeal from the District Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Central Judicial District, the Honorable Lawrence E. Jahnke, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Kipton R. Van Voorhis, Spaeth, Thelen, Van Voorhis & Jasmer, 115 S. 5th Street, Grand Forks, ND 58201-4646, for claimant and appellant.

Jacqueline S. Anderson, Special Assistant Attorney General, Nilles, Hansen & Davies, Ltd., 1800 Radisson Tower, 201 5th Street N., P.O. Box 2626, Fargo, ND 58108-2626, for appellee.

Downing v. N.D. Workers Comp. Bureau

No. 20020257

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Kim Perteet Downing (“Perteet”) appealed from a district court judgment affirming a final order of the North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau (“Bureau”) denying Perteet medical expenses after December 1, 1995, and awarding disability benefits from October 6, 1993 to October 27, 1993.  Perteet appealed to the district court asserting the Bureau’s order “is not supported by a preponderance of the evidence.”  No other document listing any specifications of error was filed.  The district court, despite a review of the record, could not find anything unfair in the manner in which the proceeding was handled.  Perteet appealed to this Court arguing the Bureau’s decision “is not supported by a preponderance of the evidence and that Ms. Perteet was not given a fair hearing.”  Perteet’s notice of appeal is so general it could apply to any administrative agency appeal.  Perteet failed to satisfy the specificity requirement of N.D.C.C. § 28-32-42(4); thus the judgment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7).   See Vetter v. North Dakota Workers Comp. Bureau , 554 N.W.2d 451, 454 (N.D. 1996).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Mary Muehlen Maring

William A. Neumann

Dale V. Sandstrom

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. Farmers Insurance Group, 2003 ND 8 (N.D. 2003).

2003 ND 8 (Wilson v. Farmers Insurance Group) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vetter v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau
554 N.W.2d 451 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1996)
Downing v. N.D. Workers Compensation Bureau
2003 ND 2 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2003)