Wilson v. Farmers Insurance Group

2003 ND 8
CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 17, 2003
Docket20020209
StatusPublished

This text of 2003 ND 8 (Wilson v. Farmers Insurance Group) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilson v. Farmers Insurance Group, 2003 ND 8 (N.D. 2003).

Opinion

Filed 1/17/03 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2003 ND 2

Kim Perteet Downing, Claimant and Appellant

v.

North Dakota Workers

Compensation Bureau,                                                                                    Appellee

        and

Pro-Serve Corporation, Respondent

No. 20020257

Appeal from the District Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Central Judicial District, the Honorable Lawrence E. Jahnke, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Kipton R. Van Voorhis, Spaeth, Thelen, Van Voorhis & Jasmer, 115 S. 5th Street, Grand Forks, ND 58201-4646, for claimant and appellant.

Jacqueline S. Anderson, Special Assistant Attorney General, Nilles, Hansen & Davies, Ltd., 1800 Radisson Tower, 201 5th Street N., P.O. Box 2626, Fargo, ND 58108-2626, for appellee.

Downing v. N.D. Workers Comp. Bureau

[¶1] Kim Perteet Downing (“Perteet”) appealed from a district court judgment affirming a final order of the North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau (“Bureau”) denying Perteet medical expenses after December 1, 1995, and awarding disability benefits from October 6, 1993 to October 27, 1993.  Perteet appealed to the district court asserting the Bureau’s order “is not supported by a preponderance of the evidence.”  No other document listing any specifications of error was filed.  The district court, despite a review of the record, could not find anything unfair in the manner in which the proceeding was handled.  Perteet appealed to this Court arguing the Bureau’s decision “is not supported by a preponderance of the evidence and that Ms. Perteet was not given a fair hearing.”  Perteet’s notice of appeal is so general it could apply to any administrative agency appeal.  Perteet failed to satisfy the specificity requirement of N.D.C.C. § 28-32-42(4); thus the judgment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7).   See Vetter v. North Dakota Workers Comp. Bureau , 554 N.W.2d 451, 454 (N.D. 1996).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Mary Muehlen Maring

William A. Neumann

Dale V. Sandstrom

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vetter v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau
554 N.W.2d 451 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1996)
Downing v. N.D. Workers Compensation Bureau
2003 ND 2 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2003 ND 8, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-farmers-insurance-group-nd-2003.