Wilson v. D'Angelo

10 A.D.2d 706, 197 N.Y.S.2d 893, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10892
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 29, 1960·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Determination dismissing petitioner from her position as clerk annulled, on the law, and the proceeding, in the exercise of discretion, remanded to the Commissioner for a new hearing and upon notice with specifications apprising petitioner of the nature of the charges made against her, with costs to abide the event. The prior notice was wholly insufficient (Matter of Edelstein v. Gale, 5 A D 2d 811). Pending a determination on the new notice and new hearing, petitioner is not entitled to reinstatement provided the Commissioner moves • expeditiously (Matter of Lindquist v. City of Jamestown, 192 Misc. 906 [Halpern, J.]; cf. Matter of Edelstein v. Gale, supra). Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. D'Angelo, 10 A.D.2d 706, 197 N.Y.S.2d 893, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10892 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

10 A.D.2d 706 (Wilson v. D'Angelo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sinicropi v. Bennett
92 A.D.2d 309 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)