Wilson v. City of Chesapeake
This text of 615 F. App'x 810 (Wilson v. City of Chesapeake) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed as modified by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Jupiter Wilson, Sr., appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss his action alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2012 & Supp.2015), and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 621 to 634 (West 2008 & Supp.2015). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we modify the dismissal order to reflect that the district court’s dismissal of the individual defendants in then’ official capacities is without prejudice, we affirm the dismissal as modified. Wilson v. City of Chesapeake, No. 2:14-cv-00420-MSD-DEM (E.D.Va. filed Apr. 3 & entered Apr. 6, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
615 F. App'x 810, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-city-of-chesapeake-ca4-2015.