Wilson v. Anthony

78 A. 1135, 75 N.J. Eq. 299, 5 Buchanan 299, 1909 N.J. LEXIS 310
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMarch 1, 1909
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 78 A. 1135 (Wilson v. Anthony) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilson v. Anthony, 78 A. 1135, 75 N.J. Eq. 299, 5 Buchanan 299, 1909 N.J. LEXIS 310 (N.J. 1909).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Vice-Chancellor Howell having denied an application for preliminary injunction in this case (Wilson v. Anthony, 72 N. J. Eq. (2 Buch.) 836), the defendant demurred to the bill, and, upon hearing, the demurrer was sustained and the bill dismissed. From the decree dismissing the bill the present appeal is taken.

The decree of dismissal should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed by Vice-Chancellor Howell in denying the application for injunction.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Reed, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Voorhees, Minturn, Bogert, Yredenburgh, Vroom, Gray, Dill—15. For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Balip Automotive Repairs, Inc. v. Schroeder
69 A.2d 760 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1949)
Second National Bank of Phila. v. Thompson
56 A.2d 492 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1947)
Wolff v. Wolff
34 A.2d 150 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1943)
Falcon B. L. Assn. v. Schwartz
186 A. 696 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
78 A. 1135, 75 N.J. Eq. 299, 5 Buchanan 299, 1909 N.J. LEXIS 310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-anthony-nj-1909.