Wilshire Credit Corp. v. 14 First Street Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wilshire Credit Corp. v. 14 First Street Corp.

289 A.D.2d 229, 733 N.Y.S.2d 912, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11749

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 3, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 289 A.D.2d 229 (Wilshire Credit Corp. v. 14 First Street Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wilshire Credit Corp. v. 14 First Street Corp., 289 A.D.2d 229, 733 N.Y.S.2d 912, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11749 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants 14 First Street Corporation and Ralph Casella appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rosenberg, J.), dated May 21, 2001, as confirmed that portion of the Referee’s report which calculated the amount due on the mortgage.

Ordered that on the Court’s own motion, the appellants’ notice of appeal from an order of the same court dated January 9, 2001, is deemed a premature notice of appeal from the judgment (see, CPLR 5520 [c]); and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The portion of the Referee’s report which calculated the amount due on the mortgage was properly confirmed, since those findings were supported by the record (see, Mondello v Mondello, 253 AD2d 861; Namer v 152-54-56 W. 15th St. Realty Corp., 108 AD2d 705; Kardanis v Velis, 90 AD2d 727).

The appellants’ remaining contentions are without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Florio, Schmidt and Townes, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI