Wilshire Credit Corp. v. 14 First Street Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wilshire Credit Corp. v. 14 First Street Corp.

273 A.D.2d 464, 711 N.Y.S.2d 891, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7376

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 26, 2000·Published

Opinion

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants 14 First Street Corporation and Ralph Casella appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Cusick, J.), dated April 29, 1999, as, upon a decision of the same court dated July 14, 1998, granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed their counterclaim.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

[465] The plaintiff established its entitlement to summary judgment by adducing evidence of the mortgage, note, assignment, and default (see, Davin v Isman, 228 NY 1; First Trust Natl. Assn. v Pinter, 264 AD2d 464; Finn v Wells, 135 Misc 53, 55). Since the appellant failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to any defense, the Supreme Court properly granted summary judgment to the plaintiff.

The Supreme Court properly permitted the plaintiff to settle the order (see, Matter of Glendora v New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal, 216 AD2d 391; Russo v City of New York, 206 AD2d 355; 22 NYCRR 202.48 [b]). Bracken, J. P., Ritter, Altman and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants 14 First Street Corporation and Ralph Casella appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Cusick, J.), dated April 29, 1999, as, upon a decision of the same court dated July 14, 1998, granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed their counterclaim.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

[465] The plaintiff established its entitlement to summary judgment by adducing evidence of the mortgage, note, assignment, and default (see, Davin v Isman, 228 NY 1; First Trust Natl. Assn. v Pinter, 264 AD2d 464; Finn v Wells, 135 Misc 53, 55). Since the appellant failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to any defense, the Supreme Court properly granted summary judgment to the plaintiff.

The Supreme Court properly permitted the plaintiff to settle the order (see, Matter of Glendora v New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal, 216 AD2d 391; Russo v City of New York, 206 AD2d 355; 22 NYCRR 202.48 [b]). Bracken, J. P., Ritter, Altman and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Wilshire Credit Corp. v. 14 First Street Corp., 273 A.D.2d 464, 711 N.Y.S.2d 891, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7376 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

273 A.D.2d 464 (Wilshire Credit Corp. v. 14 First Street Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related