Wilsey, Individually and as Special Administratrix of the Estate of Hammel v. Eddingfield Et Al.

475 U.S. 1130, 90 L. Ed. 2d 202, 106 S. Ct. 1660, 54 U.S.L.W. 3696, 1986 U.S. LEXIS 1999
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 21, 1986·No. 85-1314·Published·Cited by 15 cases

Opinions

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilsey, Individually and as Special Administratrix of the Estate of Hammel v. Eddingfield Et Al., 475 U.S. 1130, 90 L. Ed. 2d 202, 106 S. Ct. 1660, 54 U.S.L.W. 3696, 1986 U.S. LEXIS 1999 (1986).

475 U.S. 1130 (Wilsey, Individually and as Special Administratrix of the Estate of Hammel v. Eddingfield Et Al.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hunter v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company
53 F. Supp. 3d 86 (District of Columbia, 2014)
Wynn Ex Rel. Alabama v. Philip Morris Inc.
51 F. Supp. 2d 1232 (N.D. Alabama, 1999)
Thigpen v. Cheminova, Inc.
992 F. Supp. 864 (S.D. Mississippi, 1997)
Airlines Reporting Corp. v. S & N Travel, Inc.
58 F.3d 857 (Second Circuit, 1995)
Prins v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp.
757 F. Supp. 87 (District of Columbia, 1991)
Jones v. Griffith
688 F. Supp. 446 (N.D. Indiana, 1988)
Armstrong v. Mudd
655 F. Supp. 853 (C.D. Illinois, 1987)
Pallazola v. Rucker
797 F.2d 1116 (First Circuit, 1986)