Willis v. State

126 S.E. 303, 33 Ga. App. 352, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 764
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 14, 1925·No. 15947·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Bloodwobtii, J.

The offense charged in the indictment being simple larceny, and the guilt of the accused being wholly dependent upon the inference arising from possession of the cow alleged to have been stolen, and this possession being shown by uneontradieted and unimpeached testimony to be consistent with his innocence of the offense charged, the conviction of the accused was unauthorized. Peeples v. State, 5 Ga. App. 706 (53 S. E. 719); Hampton v. State, 6 Ga. App. 778 (65 S. E. 816); Gibbs v. State, 8 Ga. App. 107 (68 S. E. 472); Brooks v. State, 21 Ga. App. 661 (94 S. E. 810); Williams v. State, 125 Ga. 268 (54 S. E. 166).

Judgment reversed,.

Luke and Blood-worth, JJ., concur. Broyles, O. J., dissents. Allen & Pottle° Marion E. Allen, for plaintiff in error. Doyle Campbell, solicitor-general, A. Y. Clement, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Willis v. State, 126 S.E. 303, 33 Ga. App. 352, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 764 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

126 S.E. 303 (Willis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wright v. State
172 S.E.2d 457 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)
Cox v. State
137 S.E.2d 516 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1964)
Law v. State
128 S.E.2d 204 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1962)
Annis v. State
68 S.E.2d 473 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1951)
Davis v. State
176 S.E. 901 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)