Hampton v. State
65 S.E. 816, 6 Ga. App. 778, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 457
Opinion
The defendant’s guilt of the crime of burglary being wholly dependent upon the inference arising from the possession of stolen goods after the burglary, and this possession being shown by uncobtradicted and unimpeaehed testimony to be consistent with, defendant’s innocence of burglary, though he may have been guilty of receiving stolen goods, the verdict was contrary to the evidence, and a new trial should have been granted. Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hampton v. State, 65 S.E. 816, 6 Ga. App. 778, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 457 (Ga. Ct. App. 1909).
65 S.E. 816 (Hampton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Barnett v. State
265 S.E.2d 348 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)
Mooney v. State
178 S.E.2d 281 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)
Wright v. State
172 S.E.2d 457 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)
Cox v. State
137 S.E.2d 516 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1964)
Law v. State
128 S.E.2d 204 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1962)
Annis v. State
68 S.E.2d 473 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1951)
State v. Shepard
277 N.W. 315 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1937)
Mitchem v. State
185 S.E. 367 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)
Davis v. State
176 S.E. 901 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Willis v. State
126 S.E. 303 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)
Slaughter v. State
100 S.E. 774 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)
Gibbs v. State
68 S.E. 742 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1910)