Willis v. State
640 So. 2d 1188, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7515, 1994 WL 391046
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 29, 1994·No. No. 93-1970·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Willis contends that the trial court erred in imposing conditions of probation in the written judgment and sentence which were not orally pronounced at sentencing. We reverse the sentence and remand for resolution of the discrepancy. See Cleveland v. State, 617 So.2d 1166 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993).
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Willis v. State, 640 So. 2d 1188, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7515, 1994 WL 391046 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).
640 So. 2d 1188 (Willis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Justice v. State
658 So. 2d 1028 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Chicone v. State
644 So. 2d 532 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)