Willis v. State

640 So. 2d 1188, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7515, 1994 WL 391046
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 29, 1994
DocketNo. 93-1970
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 640 So. 2d 1188 (Willis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Willis v. State, 640 So. 2d 1188, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7515, 1994 WL 391046 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Willis contends that the trial court erred in imposing conditions of probation in the written judgment and sentence which were not orally pronounced at sentencing. We reverse the sentence and remand for resolution of the discrepancy. See Cleveland v. State, 617 So.2d 1166 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DAUKSCH, PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Justice v. State
658 So. 2d 1028 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Chicone v. State
644 So. 2d 532 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
640 So. 2d 1188, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7515, 1994 WL 391046, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willis-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.