Willis v. Reinhardt

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Willis v. Reinhardt

52 Ark. 128

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedMay 15, 1889

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 52 Ark. 128 (Willis v. Reinhardt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Willis v. Reinhardt, 52 Ark. 128 (Ark. 1889).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Replevin. The owner of personal property, seized under an attachment against the property of another, may maintain replevin against the Sheriff or other officer having it in posession. The right has been recognized by this court in many cases. Thatcher v. Franklin, 37 Ark., 64; Cox v. Vise, 50 Ark. 283; Raleigh v. Griffith, 37 Ark., 151; Clayton v. Johnson, 36 Ark., 406; Overbee v. McGee, 15 Ark., 459; Hickman v. Ford, 43 Ark., 207; Mansf. Dig., 5572, subd. 5.

Reverse the judgment and remand the cause for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Replevin. The owner of personal property, seized under an attachment against the property of another, may maintain replevin against the Sheriff or other officer having it in posession. The right has been recognized by this court in many cases. Thatcher v. Franklin, 37 Ark., 64; Cox v. Vise, 50 Ark. 283; Raleigh v. Griffith, 37 Ark., 151; Clayton v. Johnson, 36 Ark., 406; Overbee v. McGee, 15 Ark., 459; Hickman v. Ford, 43 Ark., 207; Mansf. Dig., 5572, subd. 5.

Reverse the judgment and remand the cause for further proceedings.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 Ark. 128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willis-v-reinhardt-ark-1889.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack