Willis v. Reinhardt

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Willis v. Reinhardt

52 Ark. 128

Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided May 15, 1889·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Replevin. The owner of personal property, seized under an attachment against the property of another, may maintain replevin against the Sheriff or other officer having it in posession. The right has been recognized by this court in many cases. Thatcher v. Franklin, 37 Ark., 64; Cox v. Vise, 50 Ark. 283; Raleigh v. Griffith, 37 Ark., 151; Clayton v. Johnson, 36 Ark., 406; Overbee v. McGee, 15 Ark., 459; Hickman v. Ford, 43 Ark., 207; Mansf. Dig., 5572, subd. 5.

Reverse the judgment and remand the cause for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Replevin. The owner of personal property, seized under an attachment against the property of another, may maintain replevin against the Sheriff or other officer having it in posession. The right has been recognized by this court in many cases. Thatcher v. Franklin, 37 Ark., 64; Cox v. Vise, 50 Ark. 283; Raleigh v. Griffith, 37 Ark., 151; Clayton v. Johnson, 36 Ark., 406; Overbee v. McGee, 15 Ark., 459; Hickman v. Ford, 43 Ark., 207; Mansf. Dig., 5572, subd. 5.

Reverse the judgment and remand the cause for further proceedings.

Willis v. Reinhardt, 52 Ark. 128 (Ark. 1889).

Pincite

52 Ark. 128 (Willis v. Reinhardt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related