Willis v. George Washington Life Insurance

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Willis v. George Washington Life Insurance

112 A.2d 240, 1955 D.C. App. LEXIS 244

CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 14, 1955

DocketNo. 1611

StatusPublished

This text of 112 A.2d 240 (Willis v. George Washington Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Willis v. George Washington Life Insurance, 112 A.2d 240, 1955 D.C. App. LEXIS 244 (D.C. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A jurisdictional defect is apparent on the face of the record, in that the notice of appeal was filed out of time. Judgment was entered in the trial court December 2, 1954. The ten-day period prescribed by our rule 27 for filing notice of appeal ended December 12; and that day being a Sunday, appellant had until the following day to file it. But five more days were permitted to elapse, and the notice was not filed until December 18. Rule 27 being mandatory, it is clear that appellant has no standing in this court and that we have no power to review the case. Seebold v. Holbrook, D.C.Mun.App., 103 A.2d 876; Burke v. Loughrin, D.C.Mun.App., 91 A.2d 564, and cases there cited.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

A jurisdictional defect is apparent on the face of the record, in that the notice of appeal was filed out of time. Judgment was entered in the trial court December 2, 1954. The ten-day period prescribed by our rule 27 for filing notice of appeal ended December 12; and that day being a Sunday, appellant had until the following day to file it. But five more days were permitted to elapse, and the notice was not filed until December 18. Rule 27 being mandatory, it is clear that appellant has no standing in this court and that we have no power to review the case. Seebold v. Holbrook, D.C.Mun.App., 103 A.2d 876; Burke v. Loughrin, D.C.Mun.App., 91 A.2d 564, and cases there cited.

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

112 A.2d 240, 1955 D.C. App. LEXIS 244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willis-v-george-washington-life-insurance-dc-1955.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack