Burke v. Loughrin

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Burke v. Loughrin

91 A.2d 564, 1952 D.C. App. LEXIS 212

CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 23, 1952

Docket1264

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 91 A.2d 564 (Burke v. Loughrin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burke v. Loughrin, 91 A.2d 564, 1952 D.C. App. LEXIS 212 (D.C. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Rule 27 of this court requires that notice of appeal be filed within ten days from the -entry of the judgment appealed from. The appeal in this case is from a judgment entered July 18, 1952. The notice of appeal was filed July 29 and was therefore one day late. 1 The filing of a notice of appeal is jurisdictional and unless such notice is timely filed we have no power to extend the time or to review the case. Beach v. District of Columbia, D.C.Mun.App., 44 A.2d 926; Syndicated Const. Corporation v. Ross, D.C.Mun.App., 73 A.2d 899.

Appeal dismissed.

1

. Had July 28 (the tenth day) been a Sunday or legal holiday the time would have been extended until the next day under our Rule 10.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Rule 27 of this court requires that notice of appeal be filed within ten days from the -entry of the judgment appealed from. The appeal in this case is from a judgment entered July 18, 1952. The notice of appeal was filed July 29 and was therefore one day late. 1 The filing of a notice of appeal is jurisdictional and unless such notice is timely filed we have no power to extend the time or to review the case. Beach v. District of Columbia, D.C.Mun.App., 44 A.2d 926; Syndicated Const. Corporation v. Ross, D.C.Mun.App., 73 A.2d 899.

Appeal dismissed.

1

. Had July 28 (the tenth day) been a Sunday or legal holiday the time would have been extended until the next day under our Rule 10.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

91 A.2d 564, 1952 D.C. App. LEXIS 212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burke-v-loughrin-dc-1952.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack