Willis v. Deck

133 So. 464, 16 La. App. 135, 1931 La. App. LEXIS 457
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedApril 9, 1931
DocketNo. 3095
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 133 So. 464 (Willis v. Deck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Willis v. Deck, 133 So. 464, 16 La. App. 135, 1931 La. App. LEXIS 457 (La. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

CULPEPPER, J.

This is. an action by P. C. Willis against Lee Deck and F. E. Deck.

An inspection of the record discloses that this appeal is from an unsigned final judgment rejecting the demands of plaintiff. The only showing in the record that a judgment was rendered is an extract from the minutes of the court of date February 5, 1927, which reads as follows:

“For reasons orally assigned, the demands of the plaintiff are rejected, and the suit is ordered dismissed.”

It was from that judgment plaintiff prayed for and was granted an order of appeal. The certificate of the clerk attached to the transcript recites that the transcript contains all the proceedings had in the case. No final judgment, however, shows to have been signed and filed.

It is well settled that no appeal lies from an unsigned final judgment. Hanchey v. St. L. I. M. & S. Ry. Co., 135 La. 354, 65 So. 487; Parks v. Burnside, 171 La. -, 132 So. 220.

In the above-cited cases, as in this case, the judgment was rendered orally, and an appeal granted and perfected from the judgment. In passing upon the motions to dismiss the appeals, motions having been filed in those cases to dismiss the appeals, the court said:

“This court is without appellate jurisdiction of a case until a final judgment is signed in the court below.”

No motion has been filed in this court to dismiss the appeal. In fact, defendants have made no appearance in this court, neither by counsel to argue the case nor b'y any brief filed.

However, as stated by the court in the Hanchey case, “this court will, of its own accord, take notice of the fact that it is without appellate jurisdiction, and must dismiss the appeal.” Executors of Bird v. Bird, 23 La. Ann. 262; Labatt v. Durruty, 20 La. Ann. 583.

For the reasons assigned, the appeal is dismissed, at appellant’s cost.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brawley v. Landreneau
170 So. 2d 673 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1964)
Spector v. Union City Transfer
182 So. 524 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1938)
Mossler Acceptance Co. v. Moliere
181 So. 228 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1938)
South Shore Ry. Co. v. Yazoo & M. v. R.
176 So. 678 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1937)
State Ex Rel. Cavanaugh v. Vernon Parish Police Jury
172 So. 403 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
133 So. 464, 16 La. App. 135, 1931 La. App. LEXIS 457, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willis-v-deck-lactapp-1931.