Williford v. Phillips
This text of 174 S.E. 641 (Williford v. Phillips) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. “A plea of payment which fails to allege with reasonable certainty when, how, and to whom the payment was made is insufficient, and, unless amended, should be stricken, upon demurrer, timely filed, specifically pointing out these defects.” Groves v. Sexton, 5 Ga. App. 160 (62 S. E. 731); Rentz Drug Co. v. Bishop-Babcock Co., 30 Ga. App. 391 (2) (118 S. E. 414); Montgomery v. King, 125 Ga. 388 (3) (54 S. E. 135).
2. Under the foregoing ruling, the trial judge did not err in striking the plea of payment filed in a trover suit brought under the Civil Code (1910), § 4484.
3. The evidence supports the verdict.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
174 S.E. 641, 49 Ga. App. 223, 1934 Ga. App. LEXIS 339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williford-v-phillips-gactapp-1934.