Groves v. Sexton

62 S.E. 731, 5 Ga. App. 160, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 47
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 10, 1908
Docket1305
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 62 S.E. 731 (Groves v. Sexton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Groves v. Sexton, 62 S.E. 731, 5 Ga. App. 160, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 47 (Ga. Ct. App. 1908).

Opinion

Russell, J.

1. A plea of payment which, fails to allege with reasonable-certainty when, how, and to whom the payment was made is insufficient, and, unless amended, should be stricken, upon demurrer, timely filed, specifically pointing out these defects-.

2. In pleading fraud, the specific facts constituting- fraud must be stated. The averment of fraud must not depend upon conclusions, but the conclusion must arise from the full, certain, and explicit statement of the facts relied upon to show fraud.

3. There was no error in sustaining the demurrer. Judgment affirmed.

Citations by counsel: Ga. R. 98/173; 6/437; 68/637; 79/391; 93/785; 101/741; 110/891; 113/149. John B. Gooper, for plaintiff in error. Walter J. Grace, E. W. Maynard, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Corbin v. Welfare Finance Co.
83 S.E.2d 215 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1954)
Howard Inc. v. Nalley & Co.
178 S.E. 174 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Williford v. Phillips
174 S.E. 641 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Rentz Drug Co. v. Bishop-Babcock Co.
118 S.E. 414 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 S.E. 731, 5 Ga. App. 160, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 47, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/groves-v-sexton-gactapp-1908.