Willie v. Thomas
This text of 22 Tex. 175 (Willie v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The record does not show proper service of the citations to James Willie and A. H. Willie, two of the defendants in the court helow. The return of the sheriff, on the citations to those defendants, was to the effect, that he had served them with writ, &c. We have, at the present term, held such returns to he insufficient: (Graves v. Robertson, ante, page 130.)
A. H. Willie does not prosecute this writ of error; but the reversal of the judgment, as to one of the defendants, will operate as a reversal as to all: (Burleson v. Henderson, 4 Tex. Rep. 49; Wood v. Smith, 11 Id. 367.)
The judgment is reversed, and remanded for proper service on the parties who are not properly served, and for further proceedings.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 Tex. 175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willie-v-thomas-tex-1858.