Williamsville/Southeast Amherst Homeowner's Ass'n v. Zoning Board of Appeals

188 A.D.2d 1008
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 30, 1992·No. Appeal No. 1·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order and judgment unanimously affirmed without [1009]*1009costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly determined that the Zoning Board of Appeals exceeded its authority by deciding that the conditions imposed in the rezoning approval of the Town Board were invalid and unenforceable (see, Old Farm Rd. v Town of New Castle, 26 NY2d 462, 466; Scarsdale Supply Co. v Village of Scarsdale, 8 NY2d 325, 330; Western Stone Prods. Corp. v Town Bd., 25 AD2d 493). We reject respondents’ attempt to characterize the Zoning Board’s action as an "interpretation” of the Town Board’s determination. The Zoning Board’s findings that the conditions imposed by the Town Board were impermissibly vague or prohibited amounted to an improper ruling on the validity and enforceability of the Town Board’s action. (Appeals from Order and Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Mintz, J. — Article 78.) Present — Denman, P. J., Pine, Balio, Fallon and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williamsville/Southeast Amherst Homeowner's Ass'n v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 188 A.D.2d 1008 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

188 A.D.2d 1008 (Williamsville/Southeast Amherst Homeowner's Ass'n v. Zoning Board of Appeals) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Atlas Henrietta, LLC v. Town of Henrietta Zoning Board of Appeals
46 Misc. 3d 325 (New York Supreme Court, 2013)
Williamsville/Southeast Amherst Homeowner's Ass'n v. Zoning Board of Appeals
188 A.D.2d 1009 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)