Williams v. Zuckert

372 U.S. 765, 10 L. Ed. 2d 136, 83 S. Ct. 1102, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 1727
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 22, 1963·No. 133·Published·Cited by 60 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In view of the factual contentions advanced in the petition for rehearing filed by the petitioner and in the respondents’ reply thereto, the petition for rehearing is granted and the order heretofore entered, 371 U. S. 531, dismissing the writ of certiorari is vacated. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the cause is remanded to the District Court with instructions to hold a hearing and determine whether the petitioner, desiring the presence of witnesses at his hearing, either discharged his initial burden under the applicable regulations by making timely and sufficient attempt to obtain their presence or, under the circumstances and without fault of his own, was justified in failing to make such attempt, and, if so, whether proper and timely demand was made upon the Air Force so that it was required to produce such witnesses for cross-examination. Upon making such determination, the District Court shall thereupon enter such further order or judgment as may be appropriate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. Zuckert, 372 U.S. 765, 10 L. Ed. 2d 136, 83 S. Ct. 1102, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 1727 (1963).

372 U.S. 765 (Williams v. Zuckert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harvin v. United States
661 F.2d 885 (Court of Claims, 1981)
Ramon P. Johnson v. United States of America
628 F.2d 187 (D.C. Circuit, 1980)
Blunt v. United States
322 A.2d 579 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1974)
Brooks v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals & Review
317 A.2d 864 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1974)
Roski c. United States
204 Ct. Cl. 40 (Court of Claims, 1974)
Irving Polcover v. Secretary of the Treasury
477 F.2d 1223 (D.C. Circuit, 1973)
Reynolds v. United States
454 F.2d 1368 (Court of Claims, 1972)
Jaeger v. Stephens
346 F. Supp. 1217 (D. Colorado, 1971)
Denton v. Seamans
315 F. Supp. 279 (N.D. California, 1970)
Richard L. Schlegel v. The United States
416 F.2d 1372 (Court of Claims, 1969)
James Alvin Peters v. The United States
408 F.2d 719 (Court of Claims, 1969)
Scofield v. United States
297 F. Supp. 1353 (D. Puerto Rico, 1969)
Mendez v. Macy
292 F. Supp. 802 (S.D. New York, 1968)