Williams v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Williams v. Williams

281 A.D. 691, 117 N.Y.S.2d 192, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3266

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 8, 1952·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action to impress a trust on real property, judgment dismissing the complaint reversed on the law and action remitted to the court at Special Term for a proper decision, pursuant to section 440 of the Civil Practice Act. The conclusion of the trial court that it was of opinion that the plaintiff had not made out a case is insufficient to enable us to determine what facts the trial court deemed essential or the allegations of the complaint as to which the trial court concluded the plaintiff had not sustained the burden of proof. (Mario v. De Oteris, 275 App. Div. 790; Hartman v. Hartman, 279 App. Div. 606.) Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to impress a trust on real property, judgment dismissing the complaint reversed on the law and action remitted to the court at Special Term for a proper decision, pursuant to section 440 of the Civil Practice Act. The conclusion of the trial court that it was of opinion that the plaintiff had not made out a case is insufficient to enable us to determine what facts the trial court deemed essential or the allegations of the complaint as to which the trial court concluded the plaintiff had not sustained the burden of proof. (Mario v. De Oteris, 275 App. Div. 790; Hartman v. Hartman, 279 App. Div. 606.) Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ., concur.

Williams v. Williams, 281 A.D. 691, 117 N.Y.S.2d 192, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3266 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).

Pincite

281 A.D. 691 (Williams v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related