Williams v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Williams v. Williams

281 A.D. 691, 117 N.Y.S.2d 192, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3266

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 8, 1952

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 281 A.D. 691 (Williams v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. Williams, 281 A.D. 691, 117 N.Y.S.2d 192, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3266 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to impress a trust on real property, judgment dismissing the complaint reversed on the law and action remitted to the court at Special Term for a proper decision, pursuant to section 440 of the Civil Practice Act. The conclusion of the trial court that it was of opinion that the plaintiff had not made out a case is insufficient to enable us to determine what facts the trial court deemed essential or the allegations of the complaint as to which the trial court concluded the plaintiff had not sustained the burden of proof. (Mario v. De Oteris, 275 App. Div. 790; Hartman v. Hartman, 279 App. Div. 606.) Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to impress a trust on real property, judgment dismissing the complaint reversed on the law and action remitted to the court at Special Term for a proper decision, pursuant to section 440 of the Civil Practice Act. The conclusion of the trial court that it was of opinion that the plaintiff had not made out a case is insufficient to enable us to determine what facts the trial court deemed essential or the allegations of the complaint as to which the trial court concluded the plaintiff had not sustained the burden of proof. (Mario v. De Oteris, 275 App. Div. 790; Hartman v. Hartman, 279 App. Div. 606.) Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

281 A.D. 691, 117 N.Y.S.2d 192, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3266, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-williams-nyappdiv-1952.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack