Hartman v. Hartman
279 A.D. 606, 107 N.Y.S.2d 459, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3169
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 22, 1951·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Since the judgment was on the merits and not a nonsuit, a decision [607]*607stating the facts which the trial court deemed essential was required. (Mario v. De Oteris, 275 App. Div. 790; Goldberg V. Bruns, Kimball & Co., 276 App. Div. 862.) Nolan, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hartman v. Hartman, 279 A.D. 606, 107 N.Y.S.2d 459, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3169 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).
279 A.D. 606 (Hartman v. Hartman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Russ v. Russ
3 A.D.2d 643 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1956)
Owens v. Owens
281 A.D. 884 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1953)
Williams v. Williams
281 A.D. 691 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1952)