Hartman v. Hartman
279 A.D. 606, 107 N.Y.S.2d 459, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3169
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 22, 1951
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases
This text of 279 A.D. 606 (Hartman v. Hartman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hartman v. Hartman, 279 A.D. 606, 107 N.Y.S.2d 459, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3169 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).
Opinion
Since the judgment was on the merits and not a nonsuit, a decision [607]*607stating the facts which the trial court deemed essential was required. (Mario v. De Oteris, 275 App. Div. 790; Goldberg V. Bruns, Kimball & Co., 276 App. Div. 862.) Nolan, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Russ v. Russ
3 A.D.2d 643 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1956)
Owens v. Owens
281 A.D. 884 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1953)
Williams v. Williams
281 A.D. 691 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1952)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
279 A.D. 606, 107 N.Y.S.2d 459, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartman-v-hartman-nyappdiv-1951.