Williams v. Williams

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Williams v. Williams

196 N.C. 674

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 192 N.C. 405 →

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided February 27, 1929·Published

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.

Tbe defendant, after reaching bis majority and with full knowledge of all tbe facts, accepted $360 for bis one-sixth interest in tbe lands of Robert Williams, deceased. Tbis was a ratification of tbe sale previously made, and tbe Court will not now permit him to upset tbe proceeding by motion in tbe present cause filed more than four years after such ratification. Smith v. Gray, 116 N. C., 311, 21 S. E., 200; Long v. Rockingham, 187 N. C., 199, 121 S. E., 461.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stacy, C. J.

Tbe defendant, after reaching bis majority and with full knowledge of all tbe facts, accepted $360 for bis one-sixth interest in tbe lands of Robert Williams, deceased. Tbis was a ratification of tbe sale previously made, and tbe Court will not now permit him to upset tbe proceeding by motion in tbe present cause filed more than four years after such ratification. Smith v. Gray, 116 N. C., 311, 21 S. E., 200; Long v. Rockingham, 187 N. C., 199, 121 S. E., 461.

Affirmed.

Williams v. Williams, 196 N.C. 674 (N.C. 1929).

Pincite

196 N.C. 674 (Williams v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related