Home/Court of Appeals of Kentucky/Williams v. Williams

Williams v. Williams

207 S.W. 468, 182 Ky. 738, 1919 Ky. LEXIS 404
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedJanuary 16, 1919
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 207 S.W. 468 (Williams v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams v. Williams, 207 S.W. 468, 182 Ky. 738, 1919 Ky. LEXIS 404 (Ky. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Hurt

Affirming.

Emanuel Williams died on August 26, 1891, and left a last will and testament, which had been executed on February 10,1891. He left surviving him, a widow and several children, to whom, by his will, he made devises, and,, as it appears, made a disposition, by the will, of his entire estate. Previous to 1876, he became the owner of a lot, in the town 'of Cynthiana, which was situated upon the corner of Walnut street, and Pike street, in that city. The lot abutted on Walnut street, on the east, and on Pike street, on'-the'south. The frontage of the lot, on Pike street, was forty-seven and one-half feet, and its depth, from Pike street, to the north end.of the lot, was seventy feet, nine and one-half inches. Hence, upon the eastern.'side, it abutted upon Walnut street, the entire length, from south to north. At the time Emanuel Williams acquired the lot, there was, upon it, a two-story frame building, which stood upon the corner, made by the intersection of Walnut street and Pike street, and was about twenty feet, in width, and extended along Walnut street, to a depth of fifty-six feet. On the north end of this building, and as a continuation of it, a small one-story structure stood, and it, together with the main frame building covered all of the front of the lot upon Walnut street, except a few feet, at the north end of the lot. To make the situation of the buildings and fixtures upon the lot, intelligible, reference is made to the following diagram:

[739]*739 19mEJZtYQ8c6rZYUltuEkptFgq9bsrn9mhonHRgv5PntWUbt26hRu70B7c4OFSDnEdpQNZPfSq7

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thornhill Baptist Church v. Smither
273 S.W.2d 560 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1954)
Hurst v. Standard Oil Co.
215 S.W.2d 962 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1948)
Jennings v. Jennings
187 S.W.2d 459 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1945)
Tarr v. Tarr's
82 S.W.2d 810 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1935)
Simons v. Bowers
81 S.W.2d 604 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1935)
Thomas' Ex'r v. Marksbury
61 S.W.2d 282 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
207 S.W. 468, 182 Ky. 738, 1919 Ky. LEXIS 404, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-williams-kyctapp-1919.