Williams v. Unity Healthcare Clinic
This text of Williams v. Unity Healthcare Clinic (Williams v. Unity Healthcare Clinic) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
) JAMAR FRANK BUACY WILLIAMS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 09-1730 (RBW) ) UNITY HEALTHCARE CLINIC, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
John Caulfield, one of the defendants, has moved to dismiss claims against him and has
alternatively moved for summary judgment. See Defendant John Caulfield’s Motion to Dismiss,
or in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 13. On October 13, 2010, the Court
ordered the plaintiff to file his opposition or other response to the defendant’s motion within 14
days, warning that failure to file an opposition “carries with it the risk that judgment will be
entered for [the d]efendant,” because “the Court may choose treat as conceded any motion not
opposed within the time limits put in place by the Court.” Order at 2–3, ECF No. 19. Now, over
three months later, no opposition has been filed. The Court will therefore grant the defendant’s
motion as unopposed by a separate order to issue this date.
/s/ REGGIE B. WALTON United States District Judge
Date: January 20, 2011
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Williams v. Unity Healthcare Clinic, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-unity-healthcare-clinic-dcd-2011.