Williams v. Unity Healthcare Clinic
This text of Williams v. Unity Healthcare Clinic (Williams v. Unity Healthcare Clinic) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
JAMAR FRANK BUACY WILLIAMS, * #44243-037 Plaintiff *
v. * CIVIL ACTION NO. AW-09-2179
UNITY HEALTHCARE CLINIC, et al., * Defendants ******
MEMORANDUM
On August 18, 2009, Plaintiff, a pretrial detainee presently incarcerated at Corrections
Corporation of America in Washington, D.C., filed the instant Complaint, stating that he has been
denied adequate medical care in violation of his constitutional rights. Paper No. 1. Plaintiff seeks
leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Paper No. 2.
The Court deems it appropriate to transfer the instant action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. '
1406(a).1 Under 28 U.S.C. ' 1391(b), a civil action that is not founded solely on diversity of
citizenship may be brought only in: (1) a judicial district where any defendant resides, if all
defendants reside in the same State, (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or
omissions giving rise to the claim occurred....., or (3) a judicial district in which any defendant may
be found, if there is no district in which the action may otherwise be brought. It appears that the
actions about which Plaintiff complains occurred in the District of Columbia. Accordingly, venue is
not proper in this Court2 and this case shall be transferred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 1406(a) to the
1 In so ruling, this Court will not preliminarily scrutinize the merits of Plaintiff's claims against the named parties, nor will the Court consider Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. 2 In so ruling, this Court will not examine any questions regarding exhaustion of federal remedies pursuant to ' 803 of the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995, codified as 42 U.S.C. ' 1997e, which provides that no action shall be brought by a prisoner with respect to prison conditions under 42 U.S.C. ' 1983, or any other Federal law,
2 United States District Court for the District of Columbia for all further proceedings.
A separate Order follows.
Date: August 27, 2009 /s/ Alexander Williams, Jr. United States District Judge
until he or she has exhausted available administrative remedies.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Williams v. Unity Healthcare Clinic, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-unity-healthcare-clinic-dcd-2009.