Williams v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Williams v. United States

182 F. App'x 265

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 257 F. App'x 648 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 31, 2006·No. No. 06-6136·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Michael J. Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his [266]*26628 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. United States, No. 7:05-cv-00790-jct, 2006 WL 44321 (W.D.Va. Jan. 9, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Michael J. Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his [266]*26628 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. United States, No. 7:05-cv-00790-jct, 2006 WL 44321 (W.D.Va. Jan. 9, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Williams v. United States, 182 F. App'x 265 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

182 F. App'x 265 (Williams v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related