Williams v. United States

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6692

MICHAEL J. WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; HARLY G. LAPIN; KIM WHITE; B. G. COMPTON; JERRY JONES; STRICKLAND; OFFICER STORY; G. COOPER; OFFICER GIDDINS; OFFICER MOLLICA; JESSICA JONES; OFFICER TORRES; OFFICER BOURQUE; R. FLANARY; OFFICER JOHNSON; OFFICER ELDRIDGE; OFFICER MARQUES; HARRELL WATTS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (CA-05-202-7-JCT)

Submitted: September 23, 2005 Decided: October 19, 2005

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael J. Williams, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Michael J. Williams appeals the district court’s order

dismissing without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(2)

(2000), his complaint filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28

U.S.C. §§ 1346, et seq., 2671-2680 (2000). We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant

Williams’ motion to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm the

district court’s order for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Williams v. United States, No. CA-05-202-7-JCT (W.D.

Va. Apr. 26, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -