Williams v. Taylor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Williams v. Taylor

20 A.D.3d 484, 797 N.Y.S.2d 764

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 11, 2005·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Grosvenor, J.), dated September 27, 2004, which, without a hearing, awarded custody of the subject child to the mother.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The order appealed from was, in effect, superseded by a subsequent order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated March 23, 2005, which is the subject of a companion appeal decided herewith (see Matter of Williams v Taylor, 20 AD3d 484 [2005]). In light of our determination of that appeal, the instant appeal has been rendered academic. H. Miller, J.P, Cozier, Ritter and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Grosvenor, J.), dated September 27, 2004, which, without a hearing, awarded custody of the subject child to the mother.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The order appealed from was, in effect, superseded by a subsequent order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated March 23, 2005, which is the subject of a companion appeal decided herewith (see Matter of Williams v Taylor, 20 AD3d 484 [2005]). In light of our determination of that appeal, the instant appeal has been rendered academic. H. Miller, J.P, Cozier, Ritter and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Williams v. Taylor, 20 A.D.3d 484, 797 N.Y.S.2d 764 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

20 A.D.3d 484 (Williams v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related