Williams v. State
5 Tex. Ct. App. 615
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 4 Tex. Ct. App. 5 →
Opinion
On the trial below, defendant saved a bill of exceptions to the action of the court in charging the jury verbally. This, under the statute, makes it obligatory upon this court that the judgment should be reversed. Pasc. Dig., art. 3067 ; Jordan v. The State, decided at this present term of court, ante, p. 422.
The other error complained of, viz., that the verdict is not signed by the foreman, is not well taken. Morton v. The State, 3 Texas Ct. App. 510.
Beversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. State, 5 Tex. Ct. App. 615 (Tex. Ct. App. 1879).
5 Tex. Ct. App. 615 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.