Williams v. State
This text of 6 Tex. Ct. App. 147 (Williams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this case the indictment charges that defendant “did keep, deal, and exhibit a bank for the purpose of gaming,” etc.
On the trial, a jury was waived and the cause submitted to the court; and defendant was found guilty, and his punishment fixed by the judgment rendered at a fine of $40 and ten days’ imprisonment in the county jail. Defendant mainly complains that “ the judgment was unusual and oppressively severe.” The law prescribes the punishment for such offences, and under the law he could have been fined as high as $100, and also confined in the county jail thirty days. See Acts 13th Leg. (1873) p. 36 ; Campbell v. The State, 2 Texas Ct. App. 187.
The judgment is in all things affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6 Tex. Ct. App. 147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-state-texapp-1879.