Williams v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Williams v. State

494 P.2d 960, 88 Nev. 164, 1972 Nev. LEXIS 417

CourtNevada Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 13, 1972

Docket6679

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 494 P.2d 960 (Williams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. State, 494 P.2d 960, 88 Nev. 164, 1972 Nev. LEXIS 417 (Neb. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

Per Curiam:

The appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to *165 support the jury verdict finding her guilty of unlawful use of a credit card, a violation of NRS 205.500.

Since the appellant has cited no authorities in support of her position, this court is not required to consider the assignment of error. Howarth v. El Sobrante Mining Corp., 87 Nev. 492, 489 P.2d 89 (1971); Carson v. Sheriff, 87 Nev. 357, 487 P.2d 334 (1971); Smithart v. State, 86 Nev. 925, 478 P.2d 576 (1970). We have, however, reviewed the entire record and found therein substantial evidence to prove each and every element of the crime with which she was charged. Marshall v. State, 87 Nev. 536, 490 P.2d 1056 (1971); Collins v. State, 87 Nev. 436, 488 P.2d 544 (1971). This independent review of the record which we have conducted clearly establishes that the appellant’s claim of error is frivolous. Gay v. State, 87 Nev. 540, 490 P.2d 666 (1971); Sanchez v. State, 85 Nev. 95, 450 P.2d 793 (1969).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

Per Curiam:

The appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to *165 support the jury verdict finding her guilty of unlawful use of a credit card, a violation of NRS 205.500.

Since the appellant has cited no authorities in support of her position, this court is not required to consider the assignment of error. Howarth v. El Sobrante Mining Corp., 87 Nev. 492, 489 P.2d 89 (1971); Carson v. Sheriff, 87 Nev. 357, 487 P.2d 334 (1971); Smithart v. State, 86 Nev. 925, 478 P.2d 576 (1970). We have, however, reviewed the entire record and found therein substantial evidence to prove each and every element of the crime with which she was charged. Marshall v. State, 87 Nev. 536, 490 P.2d 1056 (1971); Collins v. State, 87 Nev. 436, 488 P.2d 544 (1971). This independent review of the record which we have conducted clearly establishes that the appellant’s claim of error is frivolous. Gay v. State, 87 Nev. 540, 490 P.2d 666 (1971); Sanchez v. State, 85 Nev. 95, 450 P.2d 793 (1969).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

494 P.2d 960, 88 Nev. 164, 1972 Nev. LEXIS 417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-state-nev-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack